Site logo

The Benefice of Blenheim

Begbroke, Bladon, Shipton, Woodstock & Yarnton




Woodstock Midnight Christmas 2015

Come with me now. Come with me to the manger. Can you hear the song of the Angels? Can you see the Shepherds? Here are the animals. Here are Mary and Joseph. Here, in the manger, sleeps the baby – the Infant King. The Saviour of the World. Asleep in the hay.

Where are we? Why Bethlehem, surely. Well yes. And no.

We’re actually in Greccio. Greccio is a village in Umbria. And it was in the village of Umbria, in 1223, that Francesco di Bernardone, better known to you and to me as St Francis of Assisi, had one of his very best ideas. Francis had visited Bethlehem, he had seen the manger scene there. He wanted to make it real for the people of his native land. His nativity land, perhaps, the land of his birth. How better, than to make them all a part of it.

We read: The ideal spot was a cave. He found a baby, hay upon which to lay him, an ox and an ass to stand beside the manger. Word went out to the people of the town. At the appointed time they arrived carrying torches and candles. One of the friars began celebrating Mass while Francis himself gave the sermon. His biographer, Thomas of Celano, recalls that Francis stood before the manger, overwhelmed with love and filled with a wonderful happiness.

The people of Greccio still recreate this scene year after year. The town is now twinned with Bethlehem.

Francis wanted people to understand the story from within. By placing yourself in the story, you begin to see it, feel it, understand it totally differently. Ask any child who has been in their school nativity play. Indeed, ask anyone who was in the Passion Play that we staged in the streets of Woodstock on Palm Sunday last year. People who watched it were moved to tears. People who took part in it without faith found faith, and those who had faith found their faith deepened in an extraordinary way. Listen to these words from one of the cast:

“I think it exceeded everybody's expectation and it all came together on the day. I've been stopped by so many people in Woodstock this morning congratulating us and saying how the whole Easter story was brought home to them, and how moved they were - how the Resurrection came almost as a big relief. How Jesus' words suddenly took on a new meaning and made sense. I feel I've been part of something bigger than a theatre production, and am sure we all feel that. So very moving and quite surreal in a way to walk out behind Jesus on the stretcher in total silence and seeing so many upset people - we were suddenly in Jerusalem and it was all so real!”

We were suddenly in Jerusalem. Well, this year, this Christmas, I’d like us to do what the bidding prayer from Kings College Cambridge invites us to do – in heart and mind to go even unto Bethlehem and see this thing which is come to pass. And we can. We really can.

The story viewed from the outside can be an escape, something for the kids, just Christmas ad magic with sprinkle and sparkle.

But the story from within is no escape. The big mistake is we treat Christmas as a one-off, detached from the rest of Jesus’ life and ministry, remote from his death and passion. We’re too grown-up, too experienced, to get away with that one. The first Christmas was no Renaissance painting. It was, in every sense, utterly down-to-earth.

Funnily enough I think the Holly and the Ivy hits the theological spot. All those hints of what is to come: the holly’s prickle as sharp as any thorn, pointing us towards the crown which will be pressed on Jesus’ head. The holly bears a berry as red as any blood, forces us to recall the unavoidable cost of our redemption by the Cross.

And the point of all this? It’s about seeing the story in a new way. God’s way. Let me explain.

All of you know the deep realities of life. You're experts. You know about joy and pain. You know what it is to laugh and cry. What it is to weep over a new-born, and at a graveside. You know how great life can be. And just how rubbish it can be too.

And so does God. Because his birth means that he has understood OUR story from within. And if you can accept that truth, that's a life changer.

To say the Word became flesh is to say that God is an expert in the deep realities of life. Because he is born in us, he knows us inside out. He invites us to know him in just the same way. Not as those who look on him from afar, but as those who hold him in our arms. Not as those who read about him on the pages of a book, but as those who know his love in their hearts. For real. Not from the outside. From the inside.

So come with me now. Come with me to the manger. Can you hear the song of the Angels? Can you see the Shepherds? Here are the animals. Here are Mary and Joseph. Here, in the manger, sleeps the baby – the Infant King. The Saviour of the World.



V-J Day 2015
The Rev'd Dr Stephen Pix

V-J DAY St Mary Magdalene, Woodstock, 11.00 am (HC),
16.viii.15


First Lesson : Psalm 19.7 to 13
Second Lesson : Philippians 2.1 to 11


YESTERDAY, 15th August 2015, was the seventieth anniversary of the surrender of Japan in the Second World War the Far East theatre. It is variously known as Victory over Japan Day, V-J Day, Victory in the Pacific Day and V-P Day.

Because of the time difference, as far as the United States of America are concerned the surrender took place the day before, on 14th August 1945; but they celebrate the occasion on 2nd September, the date when the surrender document was signed.

The events leading up to the surrender are well-known: the German forces in Europe had capitulated early in the morning of 7th May 1945, and the following day, 8th May, was declared to be Victory in Europe Day, V-E Day.

Despite this, the Japanese refused to give up, and fought on ferociously until the United States dropped the two atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki on 6th and 9th August. It was this desperate measure which produced surrender a few days later.

By now we all know the problems which the delay caused to the Fourteenth Army, still engaged in fierce and costly conflict in Burma and elsewhere for more than three months after the defeat of Germany, celebrated on V-E Day in May.

Germany's surrender gave rise to unbridled rejoicing in our streets, and few people understood that, far away in the Pacific, Allied forces were still waging a relentless battle against a ruthless and implacable enemy: the description 'the forgotten army' was wholly accurate and appropriate.
Just as the victorious troops in Europe came upon horrors from the Nazi rgime, like the concentration camps at Auschwitz and Belsen for example, so the Japanese atrocities came to light after the surrender - the Burma railway, and the murder of thousands of prisoners of war after the cessation of hostilities.

All this is now widely known, not least through the film
The Bridge on the River Kwai, and the book The Railway Man by Eric Lomax. We understand how Japan's involvement in the Second World War ended, in shame and disgrace; but how did it begin?

We might have thought that there was no reason why Japan should have become involved at all: the war arose out of a European disagreement, with Germany refusing to withdraw troops from Poland, a country we were pledged to help.

In fact, however, the conflict truly was a world war, and the causes of Japan's involvement went back at least to 1931, when Japanese troops invaded and occupied Manchuria, that part of China immediately to the north of Korea, and turned it into a puppet state called Manchukuo.

The Chinese complained to the League of Nations, but no member state did more than express displeasure. The war between Japan and China continued, with the Japanese gaining ground and laying the foundations for a Japanese Empire.

When France fell to the Germans in June 1940, the Vichy rgime signed an armistice, which left the door open for the Japanese to invade French Indo-China, to help their continuing struggle with China and to extend their territorial ambitions.

The desire to build an empire to compete with the European powers, Britain, France and Germany, was understandable on its own terms; but also it grew out of the long-established Japanese culture of military conduct.
For many years, the Japanese army had adopted and encouraged certain disastrous codes of conduct. Defeat was unthinkable, so that it was far better to die than to surrender. There was, moreover, an all-consuming obsession with rank.

As a result, when it came to the treatment of prisoners of war their behaviour was often, by our standards, truly appalling. They regarded those who had surrendered rather than fight on when all hope of victory was lost as worth no more than the dirt under their fingernails, and mistreated them accordingly.

Many Japanese soldiers were kind husbands and loving fathers; the problem was the military rgime in which they had been schooled from their earliest years. It was their underlying attitude, inculcated by ruthless army training, which was at fault.

It was not that, as individuals, they were any better or worse than the rest of us; the tragedy lay in the presuppositions and assumptions dinned into them from childhood, coupled with the particular circumstances of the war in which they were engaged.

The obsession with rank meant that they were used to acting in accordance with orders from above; but when the lines of communication were long and they were largely on their own, there was no-one on hand to exercise a controlling restraint.

The Japanese system of army training is described by Major-General Clifford Kinvig, author of the influential book
River Kwai Railway in 1992. Kinvig wrote this:

'The training of the Japanese conscript emphasised the importance of willpower in battlefield success and the attainment of objectives. It made a fetish of self-discipline and the cultivation of willpower and institutionalised the popular belief that sufficient willpower can overcome any obstacle if one tries hard enough.'
The result of such ideas in a prison camp are not hard to imagine: the failure of prisoners to work hard was caused, not by weakness and poor diet, the ravages of disease, or ill-treatment, but by lack of will-power. If they would only try harder they would be able to do it.

Major-General Kinvig continues his analysis as follows:

‘Another factor made the Japanese Army particularly distinctive. This was a combination of those traits called in Japanese dukudan senko and gekokujo. In military doctrine dokundan senko implied the use of initiative and originality in emergencies.

‘The second term,
gekokujo signified the domination of seniors by juniors [...]. Both traits gave to officers in difficult situations and in distant commands a justification for independent action and often frankly insubordinate behaviour which would scarcely have been tolerated in a Western army.

‘When coupled with the Japanese belief in the importance of sincerity in motivation [...] a recipe for excesses in military behaviour was well established, particularly in commands like the Burma Area Army which were remote from Imperial General Headquarters and unconstrained by public scrutiny.’

We may, in passing, compare the behaviour of the British Army in Kenya at the time of the Mau Mau Revolt in Kenya between 1952 and 1960, when ill-conceived theories and remoteness from responsible control led to scenes of torture and murder.

The danger arises not from individual wickedness, although that always plays a part. Much more serious is the communal cast of mind which regards as normal what would be thought totally unacceptable in a different place and at a different time.

We are all in captivity to the attitudes and presuppositions which have shaped us from our earliest years. We cannot criticise them because they are the very foundations of the mind and will which need objectivity to undertake the criticism.

This lies at the very heart of our experience as Christians. We confess our sins to God, but the process degenerates into a pointless exercise: we scratch about trying to think of what we have done or failed to do, coming up with no more than trivia; and our sins become less interesting the older we get.

What we really need to confess is, not our sins, individual wrongful acts or omissions, but our sin, that warp or twist in our character which is blindingly obvious to those around us but of which we ourselves are often totally unaware.

What we need, if our confession of sin is to mean anything at all, is a reference point, a point of comparison, outside ourselves. The Greek mathematician Archimedes, of ‘Eureka!’ fame, said,
‘Give me a fulcrum and I shall move the world.’

We cannot move the world as things are, because we are part of the world and can get no purchase. However, armed with a long lever, a fulcrum across which to place it, and a firm spot to stand on, the feat could be achieved.

For Jews, the fulcrum is
‘[t]he law of the LORDdescribed in our First Lesson this morning, from Psalm 19. God has given us an objective standard by which we can challenge even our most deep-seated assumptions and presuppositions.

Christians turn to the New Testament, finding our fulcrum in Christ; in the words of the apostle Paul in our Second Lesson,
‘Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus’. Moving the world, even with a fulcrum and a very long lever, is not easy, but at least it is possible.

Amen.



Civic Service on the anniversary of the Queen's Coronation 2013
Reverend Clare Hayns

Occasions like this are wonderful in that they bring together so many different areas of Town life. Look around for a moment and think about the different institutions and bodies represented here today: Palace, Church, Town Hall, Police, Legion, Schools, youth club … If I carry on listing I’ll get into trouble by missing someone important.

There is a very old joke that goes like this:

A teacher was taking a maths lesson one day and stood before her pupil. If I have 15 apples in one hand and 10 oranges in another, what do I have?”

A little boy put his hand up and answered… “very big hands”.

The great thing about coming together on occasions like this is that so often we separate life into neat compartments, like having oranges in one hand and apples in the other, or taking the orange image [open the orange] we divided into segments. Think about all the different aspects of your lives: family, friends, work, money, hobbies, study. There are many who would argue that religion should be kept entirely separate from all these other areas of life. Religion should be just another segment of the orange - a private matter, not talked about publically (heaven forbid!) and something to be done on Sunday mornings.

But of course these things can’t be separated. God wants us to be whole people and wants to be part of every bit of our lives, not just the Churchy bit.

In the gospel reading from Matthew we hear of a time when the religious leaders, the Pharisees, try to trap Jesus by attempting to divide the physical from the spiritual. They set him a trap asking him if it’s right for the Jewish people to pay taxes to Caesar. If Jesus says they should pay taxes to the hated Conquering leader, they can denounce him as being spiritually unworthy, someone who doesn’t respect God. However, if Jesus says paying taxes is NOT allowed, his enemies would hope the temporal forces of Rome would arrest him for inciting revolt. He couldn’t win.

But Jesus’ reply, ‘Give back to Caesar what is Caesar’s, and to God what is God’s’ was more than just a clever political move. He was making a profound comment on the relationship between the physical and the spiritual, between the sacred and the secular. They can’t be separated out. Each person has to give to both Caesar and God. We can't choose to do just one or the other.

We have come here to commemorate the coronation of the Queen and although one gets the sense of her being an intensely private person, she has never kept her faith as separate to her role. Reading the transcripts from the broadcast she made after her coronation she said:

“When I spoke to you last, at Christmas, I asked you all, whatever your religion, to pray for me on the day of my Coronation - to pray that God would give me wisdom and strength to carry out the promises that I should then be making”.

She knew that with the crown came authority but also a great responsibility and she knew she needed strength from God to carry that out. And that’s for all of us who hold any role in leadership or authority, however lofty or humble. We need that same strength that Joshua needed when he took over the leadership of the Israelites after Moses’ death. In our OT reading God says to him three times: “Be strong and courageous… As I was with Moses, so I will be with you. I will never leave you or forsake you. “

God is with us in all areas of our lives, not just the segments we label ‘spiritual’.

To stick with the fruit analogy – our lives should be more like an apple! I’ll explain. An apple isn’t segmented into compartments – it’s all one fruit. It’s integrated. And to push the analogy probably one step too far – there is a core at the centre – God.

There are benefits in compartmentalising our lives.

The Churchy ones of us can come every week, sing our hymns and say our prayers and then feel so worthy and holy that we don’t then engage with the politics of the world and the mess around us. We can live in a self-satisfied spiritual bubble, disconnected from society.

But also on the other hand those of us who get so involved in the busyness and hustle and bustle of the world of finance, politics and education that we forget to stop to pray; and may neglect the core values of our faith.

So, if we were to live more like an apple than an orange , the questions we could ask are:

how does our faith permeate into the rest of our lives? Do our Christian values of justice, honesty, love and forgiveness flow out into all aspects of our life – into how we treat people at work, how we use our money, how we look after those in need or those weaker than ourselves. Does our time in Church lead us to want to get more involved with making this town better for everyone, for the young people, for those who are lonely and for those who are struggling.

Ghandi once said: ‘Those who say religion has nothing to do with politics do not know what religion is’.

There is a wonderful quote from another fabulous woman (the other being the Queen, not myself), Mother Teresa which speaks of this integration of faith into our daily lives, even when it’s really difficult to do:

“People are often unreasonable and self-centred. Forgive them anyway.
If you are kind, people may accuse you of ulterior motives. Be kind anyway.
If you are honest, people may cheat you. Be honest anyway.
If you find happiness, people may be jealous. Be happy anyway.
The good you do today may be forgotten tomorrow. Do good anyway.
Give the world the best you have and it may never be enough. Give your best anyway.
For you see, in the end, it is between you and God. It was never between you and them anyway.”

So, let’s not separate our lives out into little compartments and put God into the box marked ‘private, only for Sundays’. Jesus said: “Give to God what is God’s”, - which is of course the whole of our lives.




Easter Sunday 2013
Adrian Daffern

In nomine . . .

Alleluia! Christ is risen!
He is risen indeed! Alleluia!

The Sunday Times. Interview with the new Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, March 17th 2013.

Does he believe in all of the creed, every word? ‘Yes.’
So you believe in the resurrection of the body? ‘Yes.’
You really believe that?
‘Well, it’s what the Creed says. I can say the Creed without crossing my fingers.’
I tell the archbishop that I find it very difficult to believe such a thing.
I find it very difficult. Join the club.’

I wonder if you find the concept of resurrection difficult. After all, here you are, which presumably means that, to one extent or another, you’ve joined the club. And the club has had some very distinguished members. Today’s gospel introduces us to some of them. Today’s gospel doesn’t shy away from the difficulties that resurrection presents. But today’s gospel also gives a way to handle them, that involves seeing and remembering. Seeing and remembering. So, fellow club members, let’s look at the club book.

Luke’s account of the resurrection is different to Matthew, Mark and John. They all differ of course, just as individual reports of the same event always do. But Luke, ever the classy writer, uses language that the others don’t.
Luke’s account starts in the deep dawn –
batheos is the word he uses, in fact you could literally read verse 1 of chapter 24 as ‘on the Sabbath plus one while still very deep . . . ’. Luke sets a scene full of mystery, of anticipation, of magical tension – though what was happening was far from magic. Women came with their aromata, their fragrant spices to anoint the body. But they found, not the body of the Lord Jesus, but Flashmen. Flashmen? Yes, as in flash, you know, flashing lights. Not like those houses you see at Christmas covered in lights, where people evidently have smaller electricity bills than we do. No, these men are wearing estheti astraptousei – clothes of lightning – and lightning, in my experience, flashes, and, if you stare at it, leaves its mark behind. Imagine that scene – the intimacy of a rock-hewn tomb, with two lots of lightning in the corner. No wonder they were frightened and had to look away. The men of lightning question them: why look for the living one among the dead?

And here comes a key word. Remember.
Mnesthete. He told you about this back in Galilee! They explain. And then (v 8) THEY REMEMBER.

Think about our English word ‘remember’. Re-member. It is all about bringing back together things which have been wrenched apart. Disparate members are made whole again. To remember is to put things right, bringing into the present things leant from the past, and realising hopes for the future. And here, the women, reminded by the angels, are enabled to piece together all that Jesus had told them – and suddenly it makes sense.
They don’t see Jesus. They don’t have to. They remembered his words. And his words made sense.

But sometimes words aren’t enough to get people to join the club. Look what happens now. [Our very own] Mary Magdalene, Joanna, Mary the mother of James, and others, take the news to the club exec. And they’re not having it. In John’s Gospel it is Thomas who doubts. Here, in Luke, it’s all of them. They did not believe the women. Literally, they had no faith,
epistoun. Worse, they dismissed the story as leros, nonsense, folly, in every sense an old wives’ tale.

Seeing is believing. Or is it? Peter, who had screwed up so humanly, but so devastatingly, in Caiaphas’ courtyard, hopes so. The women weren’t going to forget the lightning imprinted on their retinas. Peter has eyes that can take in only so much – he gets there, bends over, sees the linen cloths – and then what? No Flashmen for him. Only his own confused thoughts – literally ‘he went away to himself’. I recognise that – do you? An encounter, an event, a happening which changes everything, and which takes us deep inside our inner selves, seeking a solution.

Well, how are you doing with all this? Still in the club?
Can you believe all this without having to cross your fingers? It’s a big ask. The disciples thought it was rubbish. And so do many, perhaps, most people today.

But we say:
Alleluia! Christ is risen!
He is risen indeed! Alleluia!
And if we look back at today’s gospel, we will see why. Take a look at verse 4. Our translation tells us that the women, when they came to the tomb, were wondering about this. They were in fact aporeisthai, which has its roots in a word which means lost their way, or more precisely, lost their sight, their vision. And this is before the Flashmen appeared, divine shock tactics to dazzle them with the truth.

But Easter lights are not enough. Seeing, it turns out, isn’t necessarily believing. For the women to uncross their fingers, they have to remember. Remember how he told you, while he was still with you in Galilee: The Son of Man must be delivered into the hands of sinful men, be crucified and on the third day be raised again’. Then they remembered his words. Then they remembered!

Now before we get too excited we’re not told that they got their tambourines out and launched into a chorus of
Thine be the glory. But they remember. And the remembering, and the seeing, lead to witness. They go and share the story. They may not have quite got it yet; they may not fully understand the implications; they may still be bewildered and bamboozled, but they tell the story.

The club that is this church is made up of people who can say the creed without crossing their fingers, and, I suspect, quite a few folk who do. At the risk of upsetting my boss (the Archbishop, not God) I think that that’s ok, with three provisos – though these provisos apply to all of us, no matter what we are doing with our fingers.

Proviso one: the club needs you to keep seeing. In all the deep darkness of our earthly dawns we need to keep coming, however strange that might look to the world, bringing our gifts of love to this gathering which is his Body. With eyes of faith we need to see that we are going to be surprised by what we find, that the Risen Christ is on the move, and leaves few traces behind – thought, if we have the insight, we can see the flash of glory in those traces.

Proviso two: the club needs you to keep remembering . Read the Gospels, and hear the words of Jesus, and remember the words of Jesus, allowing his words to bring you nearer to the Easter truth which sets us free. Sometimes the distractions of the world are confusing to our ears. So listen with the Spirit, and with understanding. ‘Go deep’, as Bishop John would say, be still, know God.

Proviso three: the club needs you to tell the story. As I said just now, the women at the tomb still seemed bewildered and bamboozled, but they tell the story.
Their own confusions don’t prevent them from sharing the Gospel. And nor should ours prevent us. Yes, let’s be honest about our difficulties and doubts. But let’s be honest about what we have seen and heard.
After all, the master of the wedding feast in Cana was able to rave about the wine, without knowing the vintage. We need to pour some Easter liquor into the world’s dry, empty vessels, and let people try it for themselves.



Alleluia! Christ is risen!
He is risen indeed! Alleluia!

Sabbath plus one, deeply dawned, here we gather on Easter morning. Let the Easter Gospel transform you, change you this day, into a new person, with a new way of seeing, a new gift for remembering, and a new courage for telling the story – a story that is as perplexing, thrilling, life-changing, death-defying today as it was in that first deep dawn.

And if you find all this hard to believe, then join the club.

And even if you’ve got your fingers crossed, remember that to hear his words is always to be raised from the dead. No wonder we can say

Alleluia! Christ is risen!
He is risen indeed! Alleluia!




Passion Sunday 2013
Adrian Daffern

Two voices from John 12.1-8

Judas

Bethany. Beth-a-ny. ‘House of the poor’ it means. Not kidding. Vulgar. Cheap. Nasty. What does he see in this ghastly place? What does he see in these disgusting people?

Oh and look, there’s the annoying one who does all the domestic stuff, what’s her name? Mmm? Martha, yes, that’s it. God she gets on my nerves. Over compensates. Oh and there’s the brother. Pretty good nick considering he was dead this time last week.

Ah and there’s my favourite. The Trollop. Look at the state of that, done up like God knows what. Embarrassing AND vulgar, as well as cheap and nasty. Just about sums this place up. Beth-a-ny. Oh well, better get on with it, take the bread, give thanks etc. And then wait for the collection bag, eh? Good crowd outside the door tonight, must remember to send it out there as well. Come unto Judas, all ye that are heavy laden, and I will give you emptier pockets . . .

Look out. Look out, she’s coming over. Stupid, stupid woman, has she got no decency at all? And the same name as his mother too, bit different this one, Mary, Mary quite contrar . . . oh no. Oh no. What’s she . . . what is she thinking? That’s expensive stuff that, just smell it, oh it’s divine, oh, marvellous, so, so Mmm, wonderful, and she’s, she’s, just pouring it all over his feet! And – now what? Has she never heard the law? has she no shame? Look at her, hair right down to her waist, all over him with it? That nard’s worth hundreds, that’s bad enough, but now – oh, we’re finished after this. We’ll never be taken seriously again. What a WASTE! I’ve got to say something about this,

Lord. Lord! Why was this perfume not sold for, er, three hundred denarii, and the money given to the poor?



LEAVE HER ALONE.
SHE KEEPS IT FOR THE DAY OF MY BURIAL.
YOU ALWAYS HAVE THE POOR WITH YOU.
YOU DO NOT ALWAYS HAVE ME.

Leave her alone? With pleasure. You do not always have me? Well I think you might just be right there, Lord. The time has come. The hour is near. You started this. Let’s finish it.

All this stuff about the poor, about loose women and cheap morals. Fine be that sort of messiah if you want, but I’m not interested and I’m not the only one. Three years, three wretched years trudging around watching you do your party tricks, with your big words and your big gestures, and your weird sayings they never understood. And all that time I was trying to balance the books and what thanks did I get? Ever wonder how the rest of us managed to eat when you were having fun with your tax collectors?

And now this. Waste of resources. Bad economics. No respect for the rules. Well, no rules. Enough’s enough. You brought this on yourself, Lord. You’ve only got yourself to blame. It’s your fault!

Hey, Annas. Annas! Is your son-in-law around? I’ll tell you why – got a proposition for you. You know that garden, just over the Kidron valley? Well you’ll never guess who goes out there for an after-dinner stroll . . .

Jesus

Bethany. Beth-a-ny. ‘House of the poor’ it means. So lovely here. So simple. Not the house, well, not just the house, that is pretty basic. No – them. This family. Mary, Martha, Lazarus. Those girls, so different, Martha with all that activity of hers, always on the go, never switches off; and Mary, well, Mary! I do love her, always wearing that big heart of hers on her sleeve. And my dear friend Lazarus – Father, I thank you for having heard me. I knew that you always hear me, but . . . well, thank you. We saw your glory that day.

And we see it here. In Bethany. With these people. And something tells me that something important is going to happen tonight – and by the rather odd way that Mary’s behaving over there in the corner, I have an idea that it’s got something to do with her.

+ + +

Zadok the priest and Nathan the prophet anointed Solomon king. Mary of Bethany – look at her! – anointing me. Priest and king, if only she knew. If only they knew. So much to come. So much to do. But is this the hour?
Time to speak.

LEAVE HER ALONE.
SHE KEEPS IT FOR THE DAY OF MY BURIAL.
YOU ALWAYS HAVE THE POOR WITH YOU.
YOU DO NOT ALWAYS HAVE ME.

+ + +

Father, I thank you for having heard me. I know that you always hear me. I know that you see too, see what I saw, heard what I heard. And see so differently to the way they see, not just with the eyes, but with the heart. It is what comes out of a man that defiles him. I told them, you know how often I told them.

Father, did you see his face? Did you hear the tone of his voice? What have I done to hurt him so much? What happened to him? Father, you know. Oh Judas, Judas, I had such hopes for you. I thought you’d change. Give you some responsibility I thought, the common purse, that’ll prove to you how much I trust you. But I knew, of course. I knew really. I knew what you were. I know what you are. And I know what you will be. They’re never going to forget you Judas. But they will forgive. The ones who heard me teach you how to pray, they will forgive, just as they should be forgiven.

They won’t forget her either. What she has done will always be remembered of her. Father, that smell! Father, I think she glimpsed the truth in my eyes, she saw, even if she didn’t know, briefly, the truth, the crown, the cross, the pain, the glory. Father, she anointed me! In the only way she knew how. And at what a cost for her. And yes, Father, and at what a cost for me.

LEAVE HER ALONE. SHE KEEPS IT FOR THE DAY OF MY BURIAL.
YOU ALWAYS HAVE THE POOR WITH YOU.
YOU DO NOT ALWAYS HAVE ME.

It seemed the right thing to say. It was the right thing to say. But as soon as I saw (in my heart) her reaction to those words – my burial – I saw what I had done to her. She had glimpsed the truth. But it was only a glimpse, a flickering reflection in the mirror, a spirit sweeping past in the corner of her eye. This was a lot for Mary, to realize this anointing was not just for now. It was for Friday. Friday. They have the light. They have the truth. They have us. Until Friday.

She washed my feet with perfume. I shall wash theirs too, but I don’t think Judas will be up for spending his ‘resources’ on pure nard. So just water. And the towel. A new commandment. Except it’s such an old one. But they might remember this time. I their Lord and Master, washing their feet, being their servant. They might just remember.





A Sermon for Mayor's Sunday
October 14th 2012 at Woodstock Parish Church
Adrian Daffern

In nomine . . .

Mister Mayor, distinguished guests, it’s a great pleasure to welcome you here today, the first Sunday when we are trying out our new arrangements of seating. It’s a bit of a shock to the system, to be honest, even for me, and we hope that configuring the pews like this are going to enable our encounter with God in new and wonderful ways.

Seats matter – whether they are the way we arrange our pews in church, or whether we indulge in feng shui at home to get the best out of sofas, chairs, bean bags, or whatever else we drape ourselves on.

Now, I have an experience of clergy at big dos which – and, my God, I’m about to step on thin ice – I have also known to be an experience of elected representatives gathered on ecclesiastical and ceremonial occasions. And it is this. We get very wound up about where we are sitting – and, more pertinently, where other people, are sitting, and whether their seats are better than ours.
I have been at a number of events this year, in churches, in cathedrals, in places – one palace in particular, in fact, quite near here – and sometimes I find myself on the front row. Sometimes I find myself in the middle, sometimes at the back, on one occasion, in Manchester Cathedral, at a single seat labelled Canon and Mrs Adrian Daffern. Both fully robed, and in the middle of a procession which had ground to a halt behind us, Megan and I looked at it, decided that it might look slightly undignified if we sat on one another’s laps during the service, and took ourselves off elsewhere.



In the New Testament, we learn that delusions of grandeur, and anxiety about status, were very real for the first disciples. James and John were keen to know that they would have seats either side of Jesus at the Banquet of the Kingdom. This wound the other disciples up, as it would wind you or me up, if we thought someone was pushing in – think back to the queues for petrol a few weeks ago if you don’t believe me.

But the Kingdom of God is not a place where status and grandeur are even remotely relevant. And this morning’s gospel reading tells us why.

The disciples had been arguing over who was best. Jesus sat down (which means he was going to teach them something important) and took a little child in his arms. He said

Whoever welcomes one such child in my name welcomes me,
and whoever welcomes me, welcomes not me but the one who sent me”.

To have an awareness of the seemingly smallest members of society is to have an awareness of God. To welcome a child, is to welcome Christ in our midst. Moreover, we are called to be like children, if we are to glimpse, and enter, the Kingdom.

I’ll let you into a secret. I am a big kid. Actually, that’s probably not a secret. More seriously – and I am dead serious here – I strive to be like a child. Not childish, but childlike. After all, to be childish is no use at all. To be childish is to demonstrate a lack of awareness, to be selfish, to grab, to push, to want. But childlike – that is a different matter. To be childlike is to have a different take on the world around us. It is to lose our in-built cynicism, world-weariness and smart Alec attitudes, and to look with wide eyes at the wonders that lie around us. And, most importantly of all, to be childlike is to know how much we need to be loved, how dependent we are, how desperate we are to know that others care, and ultimately, to know that God cares.
The world looks at our CV’s, our biographies, our public image. Such things might impress. But would the things which only we know about, impress those whose favour we seek? Our secret habits, prejudices, attitudes, opinions? I doubt it. Those who are called to serve in public office, whether that be as Archbishop of Canterbury, or Prime Minister; Leader of the County Council, or a Mayor of one of Oxfordshire’s beautiful market towns; or even Rector of one of them – we are called to be child-like. We are flawed, screwed up, confused, and yet infinitely loveable, creative human beings, with potential for good, for generosity, for love. But we are vulnerable, my goodness are we vulnerable. And it is our vulnerability that reminds us that the child in all of us is someone we have to take seriously. To ignore that child is something we do at our peril. To know the child within us is to know how much we need to be loved – which hopefully means that we can love in return.

And for the Christian, all of this is brought sharply into focus by an event which we will celebrate in almost exactly three months time. For it is as a child that God entered into our humanity, dependent and vulnerable, just like us. Of course, the Gospel doesn’t stop there. But it does begin there. And so perhaps should we. Because it is with the eyes of a child that we shall see God’s glory, and with the open, uncluttered, wonder-full mindset of a child that we might have a relationship with Him that is real.

The child is us can also keep our feet on the ground. I was doing a junior school assembly in Stafford once about following Jesus, and used my clerical collar as an example. “Why do I wear a collar like this?” Hands shot up. I decided to be brave, and asked a dippy looking little chap towards the front row. “Do you know why I wear this collar?” I asked sweetly. He nodded very solemnly. “Are you going to tell everyone?” he nodded again, and before I could stop him, announced in loud tones “It’s because you’ve got fleas”.


Listen to the voice of the child within you. It will help you remember who you really are, and what you really need. And listen to the voice of that other Child, the one who was born in Bethlehem in order that we might be saved. His voice will help us to know our need of love, and how we can bring others to that love; by the way we serve him in council chamber and public square; and by the way we serve him with our hearts, and with our lives.






Pentecost Sermon 2012
Clare Hayns

John 15:26-27; 16:4b-15, Acts 2: 1-21

Come Holy Spirit, fill the hearts of your faithful people and kindle in us the fire of your love. Amen

I wonder what comes into your mind when you hear the word Pentecost. My guess is you think of Pentecostal Churches with lots of hands in the air, shouting out Alleluia and speaking in tongues. Am I right? I imagine when it comes to raising our hands in the air we are more [hands up in horror] than [hands up in praise]!

I was once asked to speak in a Pentecostal Church in C. Oxford and to give a notice about the foodbank. It was a simple request. The service started at 2pm and didn’t end until about 5.30pm. During it a Sri Lankan woman spoke about her country and then sang songs, some Sri Lankan songs. I gave my little notice and then they asked me to sing a song! Thankfully had taken friends with me and one of them was a worship leader so we got him up to lead a song! Great fun.

However that is not what Pentecost is all about. Pentecost is not about how we worship but is a celebration of great outpouring of the Holy Spirit on the disciples of Jesus, a dramatic moment which transformed the disciples and marked the beginning of the Christian Church. We would not be here today if it were not for what happened at Pentecost.

‘Pentecost’ was actually originally a Jewish festival. It wasn’t invented by Christians. The Jews were celebrating the festival of Pentecost when the Holy Spirit came in power. It was a thanksgiving for the first fruits of the harvest which happened 50 days after Passover. Pentecost literally means 50. It’s no accident that a celebration to mark the first fruits of the harvest came to symbolise the beginning of the Church – the first fruits of the kingdom.

So the disciples were gathered in an upper room once again. Jesus had told them to stay together in Jerusalem and wait for his Holy Spirit and they were obedient to this. And then what happened was beyond description, beyond normal language. We saw this last week with the Ascension – so hard to describe you end up using picture language. There was a sound like rush of a violent wind – it was undoubtedly very noisy; it seemed as if tongues of fire were resting on each of them, but obviously they didn’t burn, and they were given an ability to speak in other languages. Dramatic stuff. And of course fire and wind and language have strong biblical resonance. Fire – of course we remember God speaking through the fire at the burning bush (which is badly named as it doesn’t actually burn!) When God is described as fire it’s almost always not a destructive force but is rather renewing and purifying. And we also say ‘being fired up’ meaning excited, enthused. Which is exactly what the disciples were after Pentecost.

And then Wind: The Hebrew and Greek words for the spirit (Ruach and Pneuma) are the same words used for the blowing of the wind and breath. Genesis 1: “In the beginning when God created the heavens and the earth.. a wind from God swept over the face of the waters”. The spirit of God, literally the breath of God, which had been there since the beginning, since creation, was breathed on the disciples and gave them LIFE. And this LIFE giving force enabled them to speak and hear the Good News of Jesus across language barriers.

But in fact the dramatic signs were not what was most important. If it had just have been a one off dramatic experience with no lasting consequence then it wouldn’t have been so significant. The most important thing was the transformation the Holy Spirit had on the individuals and on the community. After Pentecost the disciples were transformed into men and women who built up the kingdom of God, who preached with authority, who healed the sick, who travelled the world, who endured hardship and were willing to live and die for Jesus.

Just look at Peter. He has been transformed from a frightened man who a few weeks earlier denied he even knew Jesus to a leader of the first Church. See verse 14 “But Peter, standing with the eleven, raised his voice and addressed them. Men of Judea and all who live in Jerusalem…” Somehow when he stood up to speak he knew what to say and wasn’t afraid any longer. He had been utterly changed.

Many of us might think that the Holy Spirit is really just for particularly spiritual people, or people who are good at praying and go to Church every week . Perhaps it is a reward for good behaviour. But look at the disciples. Were they given this power because they had been particularly committed, prayerful and spiritual? Did God look at them and decide, now this a particularly talented and holy group – I’m going to base my entire Church on this lot. Not at all. They were just as scared, ordinary, weak and hopeless as us. It was a matter of grace. A totally undeserved gift. All the disciples had been told to do in order to receive this power was to wait. Acts 1 “Jesus ordered them not to leave Jerusalem, but to wait”. Wait. And they were obedient to this.

The wonderful thing about what happened at Pentecost and why it really, really matters to us here today is that from this day on the Holy Spirit was poured out (the word poured here is like a torrential downpour not a drizzle), poured out on all people, not just on the Jews as before, not just on very particular chosen prophets, not just on the really prayerful and spiritual people, but on ALL people who believed, men and women, slave and free, Jew and gentile. And the good news is that this life giving transformation wasn’t just for the disciples 2000 years ago but is for us, here and now, in Bladon/Woodstock.

So how does the Holy Spirit work in our lives? What does it mean to be ‘spirit filled’? I imagine most of us if asked about our faith journey would not have a dramatic experience of the Holy Spirit as described in Acts. But perhaps we have been aware of being gently guided and led at times in our lives? Or perhaps there have been times when we have unexpectedly had the courage to speak up about our faith; or we may have experienced times when everything has seemed so difficult and bleak but somehow we have known God has been at work deeply in our lives through it. I remember when I first came to faith and knew that the spirit of God was with me because suddenly I felt fully alive. I was in my 20’s at the time. I found that I began to notice areas in my life that weren’t quite right, there were some relationships that needed mending for example, I also found that I began to have a desire to pray and read the bible, and I began to see things differently, to notice people who were in need.

God’s Holy Spirit is at work in our lives, in our Church and in the world all the time, often we don’t even recognise Him. Sometimes He is like a gentle breeze comforting and nourishing us, sometimes like a rushing wind, pushing us on to new and exciting things, sometimes like a fire getting rid of all the bad stuff so the good stuff can be revealed. But always renewing and transforming us so that we can be witnesses in the world. Because the simple fact is that the whole point of Pentecost was that after they receiving the Spirit the disciples then left the upper room and went into the world preaching and living out the Kingdom of God. The Holy Spirit produced fruit: love, joy, peace, gentleness, self control. What is the fruit of the Spirit in our lives?

There is no point in us getting together on a Sunday, singing and praying, whether it is with our hands raised in the air or rigidly by our sides, whether it is singing chorus’ or hymns, if that is all we do.

So how is the Holy Spirit at work in our lives, in our Church, in our village/town?

Are we willing to wait for Him and to be led by Him or are we as individuals or a Church huddled in the upper room, scared to go out in the world?

The wonderful truth is that God chose to equip normal people like you and I to reveal His kingdom to the world. God gives us this power from on high so that we can reveal Him to the world. Let us do just that. Let us leave our upper room and go out into the world filled with the Holy Spirit.

Come Holy Spirit, fill the hearts of your faithful people and kindle in us the fire of your love.

Amen




Parish Eucharist September 2011
Clare Hayns

I doubt there are many who would look at me and say ‘I know who you remind me of... Dawn French’. But she’s still the most famous woman vicar isn’t she and I’ve lost count of the times that people have said ‘Oh, you’re going to be a vicar... you’re just like the Vicar of Dibley’. I love that programme though and one of the great characters is the old chap on the PCC who’s two main lines are ‘no, no, no, no, yes’ and yes, yes, yes, yes, no.
He’s the classic example of the man who changes his mind. He reminds me of these two brothers in Matthew’s parable. They are both asked by their father to go and work in the vineyard. One of them says, rather belligerently ‘I will not’; he says ‘no, no, no’ and then changes his mind, says yes and decides to go. The other brother in contrast says ‘yes, yes, yes, sir’, ever polite, ever proper, but in fact doesn’t go.. he does his own thing.

Like all the parables, Jesus uses the story to reveal a message to those who are listening. This story was told to the religious, Jewish leaders in the temple in Jerusalem. He had arrived on a donkey, been into the temple and had turned over the tables, and had been healing on the Sabbath. They considered him to be dangerous. Both his actions and his words were subversive. To them he was even more dangerous that John the Baptist who they had also distrusted. These leaders were the ones with authority in the Synagogue, they were the ones who knew that they were God’s chosen ones, the elite. They knew all the laws and the scriptures. But Jesus was here describing them as the son who says to his father ‘yes, yes, yes’ but who in fact doesn’t do his will’. He says to them ‘even though you listened to John the Baptist and have seen the miracles I do... “even then you did not change your mind”.

And then, scandal of all scandals, he contrasts them to those whom everyone knew were the ones outside of the God’s community, the tax collectors and prostitutes. He compares them to the brother who said no, no, no but then changed his mind and said yes. He says “, “Truly I tell you, the tax collectors and the prostitutes are entering the kingdom of God ahead of you”

At that time tax collectors and prostitutes and were on the outside of society. Tax collectors were collaborators with the hated Roman rulers and were considered dishonest . Prostitutes were considered unclean and threatened Jewish society. And here was Jesus saying these people were the ones to understood and respond to the message given by both John the Baptist and him.

Why is it that it was so much easier for those on the edge of society to believe Jesus than it was for the religious leaders? Why were they so much more willing to change their minds? Perhaps it was because they had so much less to lose and so much more to gain? There is a lovely story told by the American preacher Tony Campolo about his encounter with a group of prostitutes late one night in Hawaii! He was in the middle of a preaching tour and was in Central Honolulu late one night and as he had jet lag he couldn’t sleep. He decided to go to a late night coffee shop and whilst he was there a group of scantily clad women came in and he realised they were prostitutes. He overheard one of them telling her friend that the next day was her birthday. Her friend was scathing and dismissive. ‘So, why do think I care... what do you want from me.. a birthday party’. The woman who’s birthday it was said ‘I was just telling you, that’s all. I don’t expect a party, I’ve never had one before’. After they had gone, Tony had an idea. Why don’t we throw a party for this girl. He found out from the cafe owner that they come every night at the same time and that her name was Agnes. He then planned a party, with decorations and a banner with Happy Birthday Agnes on it. The cafe owner organised a cake and the cafe owner got the word out and by 3 the next morning the cafe was filled wall to wall with prostitutes! When Agnes walked through the door they all shouted ‘Happy Birthday’. You can imagine the shock. Her mouth fell open, her legs buckled and she was led to a stool they all sang HB. Then when the b’day candles were lit she openly wept. Rather than cutting the cake straight away she asked if they would mind if she could take it to show her mother and she then took the cake, holding it like the holy grail, and went to show off the only b’day cake she’d ever had.

The bar owner then found out that Tony was a preacher and asked what kind of Church he went to. His answer was “the kind of church that throws parties for prostitutes and 3 in the morning”. The owner thought about this and replied “No you don’t, there’s no Church like that. If there was, I’d join it. I’d join a Church like that!”

When you hear to this story you realise how utterly radical Jesus was. He was doing just this wasn’t he? He was throwing parties for prostitutes, was touching the lepers, was eating and drinking (and it wasn’t alcohol free wine!) with tax collectors. He was saying everyone “you are worth something even if no-one else thinks so”; he was saying “you are loved and accepted”; he was saying “I love you just as you are but I also love you far too much to let you stay just as you are”; he was saying “trust me and follow me”. And no wonder they changed their lives to follow him. No wonder this prostitute in Honolulu accepted the cake offered to her.

But Jesus wasn’t just reaching out to those on the edges, he was also going to the religious leaders and rulers asking them to follow him. But they didn’t respond in the same way. The religious leaders on the other hand thought they knew it all and thought that they could go through the motions by saying the right things but actually didn’t really believe they needed to change at all. The questions they asked Jesus about John the Baptist were only trying to catch him out, they weren’t really wanting answers that would mean that they had to change the way they lived.

But they were asking a very good question about what authority Jesus had to say and do such things. Who was Jesus? Who is this man who is challenging the very structures of their world? Why should they listen to him? Why should WE listen to him?

These are of course good questions and ones that we need to ask because of course these aren’t just questions asked by people 2000 years ago but these are questions we still need to ask today. Faith is about change isn’t it. St Paul says “be transformed by the renewing of your minds”

If we are going to change our minds about anything then we need to know who it is that we are following don’t we? If I tell you about some mathematical formula that’s been discovered you shouldn’t believe me as I know absolutely nothing about maths!

So who is Jesus and what kind of God do we believe in? Who is it we are asked to say ‘yes, yes, yes’ to?
The wonderful passage in Philippians tells us. “have the same mindset as Christ Jesus”
Who, being in very nature God,
did not consider equality with God something to be used to his own advantage;
rather, he made himself nothing
by taking the very nature of a servant,
being made in human likeness.
Our God, the God of creation, the God of all things, became a humble man, a servant. He came down from heaven to raise us up. Jesus turns authority on its head. For him there is authority in service. ‘Being made nothing, taking the very nature of a servant’. He turned everything upside down. He changed all the rules.

Faith is a constant journey of change and of course this applies to us all, whether we’ve been to Church for decades or for the first time today. As in all areas of our life growth comes from being open to change and challenge. If we refuse to change we can’t grow. I realise thought this is hard. We get set in our ways and it’s hard to let go of certain ways of thinking; hard to let go of our ideas about God that may have been formed in childhood; or patterns of behaviour that have become stuck. The challenge today to think about is ‘are you open to God changing you, in whatever ways He chooses’.

In the Philippines there is a monkey trap that works by having a pole and tethered to the pole with a chain or rope is a jar with nuts in it. The jar has a small hole through which a monkey can just fit its hand. The monkey sticks his hand in the bottle to get the nuts and then can’t get his hand out without letting go of the nut because the hole isn’t big enough to let his fist through. The only way he can take his hand out is by letting go of the nut. Even when the trackers walk up to it the monkey still keeps hold of the nut. The monkey is not willing to let go of that which it thinks is best for itself, even though in doing so it is sacrificing its freedom. It can be like that with us. We can hold on to beliefs and ways that we think are right but actually they deprive us of our freedom. The Pharisees were like that. The held onto their rules and laws even though J was there offering them a freer, better way to live. Do we say ‘yes, yes, yes’ with our words but actually close ourselves off and say no to God. Or do we take the risk of faith, let go of the nut, change our minds and say YES.




Midnight Mass 2012
Adrian Daffern

We are very blessed at the Rectory in that we get lots and lots of Christmas cards, and I have a small obsession, which drives my wife potty, of counting them, partly for fun, and partly to check that I am still loved. We have hundreds to date, and thank you if you were a sender.

It is always interesting to see what cards people choose. Most of them these days are some sort of charity card, and that’s always seemed a good thing to me. Very posh people send me cards which have pictures of themselves and their families on the front, and I like those ones tool, because it’s nice to have pictures of friends around the room at Christmas. Some people seem to think I have a sense of humour, and so there are quite often a few funny cards – this year I have particularly enjoyed the one with the angel on the hillside, who just starts to say ‘I bring glad tid . . .) only to be interrupted by a Shepherd who replies (you’re too late mate, it’s all over Twitter!

But because I’m ordained most people send me cards of religious nature, so I don’t tend to get many of the jolly Santa sort. Mine tend to have renaissance nativity scenes; quite a number depict choirboys (never choirgirls for some reason) carrying lamps in a snowy procession to a medieval church - these come in two varieties, with glitter, and without glitter. I get a fair few angelic hosts, and a fair few Magi (Wise Men) bearing oddly shaped and gaudily wrapped geometric shapes which represent those weird and difficult gifts of gold, frankincense and myrrh – not exactly top of your Amazon wish lists I’m sure.

Most of my cards this year seem to depict Bethlehem. I’m glad about this because in February I went there. Obviously they depict Bethlehem as it was 2000 years ago, not as it is now. And if they are right, that means that Bethlehem 2000 years ago looked rather like a set of timeshare apartments in Ibiza, all white blocks with flat roofs and tiny doors and windows, alternating squares and rectangles.
True, there isn’t usually a pool (though there are quite a few palm trees) and my cards often have a prominent star on them as well. And very pretty they are too.

But they no more tell the reality of what Bethlehem was like 2000 years ago than they tell the reality of what Bethlehem is like now. We can only make educated guesses about Bethlehem 2000 years ago. It wasn’t very big, much smaller than Woodstock, perhaps more the size of Bladon. It was compact and hectic, as close to Jerusalem as we are to Oxford.

It is still compact, though the population now numbers around 25, 000. And it is still hectic, but for all the wrong reasons. How still we see thee lie? Don’t you believe it. It has, in fact, been caught up in one conflict or another for much of its turbulent history. Since December 1995, the city came under the complete administration and military control of the Palestinian National Authority, but during the Second Palestinian Intifada, in 2000-2005, Bethlehem's infrastructure was severely damaged. In 2002, it was a primary combat zone in Operation Defensive Shield, a major military offensive by the Israeli Defence Forces They besieged the Church of the Nativity, where about 200 Palestinian militants sought refuge in the Church. The siege lasted for 39 days and ten people were killed – inside the church.

It was this same ancient Church of the Nativity that I and 40 other clergy headed to at 6am on a cold February morning this year. We had to wait for early worship to finish in the grotto beneath the church, and then, once the caretaker had swept the steps, we were allowed into the space where, the tradition holds, Jesus was born. Was this the place? Who can say? It’s the tradition, certainly, and has been for the most of the last 2000 years. And it was with a strange mixture of excitement, and not a touch of sceptic, that I waited my turn. For what? Well, to one side, at a jaunty angle, there is a tiny alcove, with seven hanging lamps over a silver star. And the silver star marks the spot.
You have to get down on your hands and knees to get there, and, once you are there, well, there isn’t much else you can do except touch the centre of the star with your head. So I did.

I’m not sure what I was expecting to happen, but something did. Something extraordinary. I didn’t feel an electric shock, or a great spiritual awakening; there was no voice, no angelic song of glory and peace. What there was was weeping. My eyes filled with tears – and whether that was the spot, or not, all I can say is that I felt a deep sense of having found, like T S Eliot’s Kings, that it was satisfactory, and more so. A deep sense of the truth being understood for the first time welled up inside of me. Emotion? Oh yes, of course. But very, very real.

To journey to Bethlehem is difficult these days. There are checkpoints, walls, barbed wire and armed soldiers. There were versions of all of these things, of course, one night when, about 2000 years ago, in occupied territory, in what amounted to an underground cave, a child was born who would change the world, by what he said, by what he did, but above all, by what he was.

The Church of England has recently behaved, at a national level, in an appalling way. The generous, inclusive, radical, loving Gospel of Jesus Christ has been made to look like a bizarre, out-of-touch sect, with little room for compassion and hopefulness, especially if you’re a woman, and particularly if you’re gay.

But despite the best of efforts of the Church to mess up the message, I urge you, this Christmas, to let a little bit of Bethlehem into your life. For what Christians celebrate – what this church celebrates – is a miracle which is true. It is this: that what took place in Bethlehem 2000 years ago can take place in your heart right now. It’s just like the carol says: where meek souls will receive him, still the dear Christ enters in.

I know it seems weird. I know it seems impossible.
I know that every human fibre wants to resist it, can’t quite deal with it, finds it hard to grasp – but I, and millions and millions like me, believe it to be so. The world is a different place is you let Christ be born anew in you. And you do it by making a choice: choose to be kind, choose to be generous, choose to be tender-hearted, choose to be forgiving – you’ll be well on your way.

But there is one further choice which is yours to make, and it lies before you tonight – to choose to believe in a God who is revealed, as one of my friends has written this week,

not . . . in the stars but in the crib. Here the hope of humanity is continually renewed. God is not an old man with a beard. God is not some great cosmic power that believers can borrow for their own limited, and often bigoted, schemes . . .God is to be discovered in the vulnerability of a child, in the excessive openness and dependence upon something outside one's own power or ability to explain.

This is the God I believe in, the God we believe in – the Christmas God, dependent, vulnerable, simple, adorable. Don’t be fooled by any other message you hear this Christmas. Make your choice – and let the words of the great carol be your prayer; more than that, your heart’s desire:

O holy Child of Bethlehem,
descend to us, we pray;
cast out our sin, and enter in
be born in us today.

We hear the Christmas angels
the great glad tidings tell:
O come to us, abide with us,
our Lord Emmanuel.







Remembrance Sunday 2012

A Sermon for the Benefice of Blenheim 11th November 2012
Adrian Daffern

I want to paint a perfect picture
A world of make-believe
No more hunger, war, or suffering
The world I’d like to see.

The chorus of a children’s song, often sung around this time of year. I want to paint a perfect picture: no more hunger, war, or suffering. Well, it’s a nice idea isn’t it – a world of make-believe indeed. Such a vision is far far away, and on this Sunday of all Sundays we know just how far. We have just remembered the sixty Woodstock men who gave their lives in the two Great wars. And it goes on. 437 United Kingdom personnel have died in Afghanistan since 2001.

But it’s not only our boys and girls. It’s real boys and girls from other places. According to UNICEF, more than 2 million children have died as a direct result of armed conflict and more than 3 times that number have been permanently disabled or seriously injured. The same report estimates that 20 million children have been forced to flee their homes, and more than 1 million have been orphaned or separated from their families, and that 3 hundred thousand child soldiers (boys and girls) under the age of 18 involved in more than 30 conflicts worldwide.

I want to paint a perfect picture. A world of make-believe. No – it’s hopeless isn’t it? A goal too far. The world is too big for us to do anything about.

And that’s probably true. But we are a part of the world. Woodstock is our little world. So why not at least set about painting the perfect picture here – would that be a world of make-believe?
How does that song go again – no more hunger, war, or suffering? Well, come on! Where’s the hunger, war and suffering around here?

I’ll tell you. It’s everywhere. You don’t have to look for it. You just have to open your eyes.

Let’s start with hunger: you walked past two big plastic boxes at the back of church when you came in. They are for donations to the North Oxfordshire Foodbank, which currently is making a real difference to the lives of over 70 adults and 60 children – not by giving them extras, but by giving them basics. Real hunger, here, under our noses.

But there are other kinds of hunger too. I think it was on a visit to this country that Mother Teresa felt moved to comment on the poverty she encountered. When she was challenged by her surprised host, she replied We think sometimes that poverty is only being hungry, naked and homeless. The poverty of being unwanted, unloved and uncared for is the greatest poverty. There is that kind of poverty in our own communities – and we should do something about it. On Remembrance Sunday, we remember that 60 men of Woodstock made the ultimate sacrifice so that our world would be different – no more hunger, war or suffering. We will honour their memory when we eliminate the physical, spiritual and emotional hunger in our communities.

No more hunger. No more war. We know about war in our world: it’s everywhere, our TV screens and newspapers are full of it. Afghanistan. North and South Sudan. Iraq. Zimbabwe. Israel and the Palestinian peoples. But there’s war here too. I encounter it nearly every day? Where? In conversations. In encounters. In the street. In the pubs. In church. War which involves the all too conventional weapons of our language and our mindset. There are families at war, resentments that have lasted for generations.
There are individuals at war, differences festering and unresolved. There is gossip, muttering, and prejudice. It is wrong. And it should stop.

On Remembrance Sunday, we remember that 60 men of Woodstock made the ultimate sacrifice so that our world would be different – no more hunger, war or suffering. We will honour their memory when we eliminate the verbal, manipulative and corrosive war of words that infect our communities.

No more hunger. No more war. No more suffering. We know about suffering in our world: of the displaced and the refugee, the homeless, the oppressed. Children, men and women who are abused as a result of cruelty, policy or neglect.

And there is suffering here too. It’s often the stuff of life of which we can do nothing about. We get hurt. Relationships shatter. We become ill. Loved ones die. But there are other kinds of suffering too – people who find themselves isolated, and alone. Individuals who often find it harder to belong than we might imagine. People who we find it easier to ignore, than to engage with. In these circumstances we can all make a difference.

On Remembrance Sunday, we remember that 60 men of Woodstock made the ultimate sacrifice so that our world would be different – no more hunger, war or suffering. We will honour their memory when we do all we can to bring healing, peace and hope to those who are suffering in our communities.

I want to paint a perfect picture
A world of make-believe
No more hunger, war, or suffering
The world I’d like to see.

We come here, rightly, year after year, to remember, and to pray. At the going down of the sun, and in the morning, we say, we will remember them. But our remembering is lacking unless our fine words lead to even better deeds.

Think about the word ‘remember’. Re-member. It is all about bringing back together things which have been wrenched apart. Disparate members are made whole again. To remember is to put things right. And you and I have the power to do just that. No, of course we can’t wave a magic wand and make heaven on earth tomorrow. But we can have a good go at making heaven on earth here in Woodstock. And we can start today. We are all sinners. We all need to change. And with God’s help we can. Not for our sakes – but for the sake of one another. For the sake of this community. For the sake of the world.

When you go home, tell them of us, and say
For your tomorrow, we gave our today.

We remember our fallen heroes of the past, and of the present. And to remember them properly, we need to do more than repeat much loved prayers and phrases. We need to build the kind of world that they hoped might one day be real. No more hunger, war, or suffering. That’s the world – or should I say, the Woodstock – that those whom we remember today would surely like to see.

It is the Woodstock that God would like to see.





Jubilee Sermon 2012
Adrian Daffern

Trinity Sunday, 3rd June 2012 :
The Diamond Jubilee of Her Majesty The Queen

It is a season for statistics. 1,500 miles of bunting. 200,000 bottles of champagne (and that’s just the ones sold at Tesco’s, apparently). 2.8 million Victoria sponges. 2 million punnets of strawberries. And this afternoon, a seven-mile, 1000 boat flotilla, and at its heart, a 60-metre, twelve tonne floating belfry, with eight bells, all moving at an appropriately stately 4mph. All of which is part of the reign of one monarch for 60 years.

And those sixty years produce another set of statistics. Since 1952 there have been 5 Rectors (!), 6 Popes, 8 Secretaries-General of the UN, 12 Presidents of the US, 13 Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom – and just one Queen. It is extraordinary.

But what is truly extraordinary is not the quantity but the quality. Yes, 60 years is an astonishing and wonderful achievement, and it gives us a marvellous opportunity for a celebration. The Gospel is, after all, at its heart, about parties as much as prayers. But what is best, it seems to me, about these celebrations, is the opportunity it gives us to reflect on the kind of monarch who can, over 6 decades, inspire such loyalty, affection, respect, and love.

And the answer is simple. The kind of monarch who inspires such loyalty, affection, respect, and love, is a monarch who understands – and I might say, understands with Christian understanding - her vocation as one who serves.

‘I declare before you that my whole life, whether it be long or short, shall be devoted to your service’ said The Queen in her first public broadcast some years before her accession.

It’s a theme Andrew Marr recognizes in his recent biography of The Queen – some of you will have seen the TV programme – when he states ‘it was as if she was offering herself as some kind of living human sacrifice’.

The love that asks no questions, the love that stands the test, that lays upon the altar the dearest, and the best.

This theme, of sacrificial service, so recognizable in the life of The Queen, is what today’s Gospel reading is all about.

The disciples are, on the face of it, a pretty woeful bunch. They included a thief, a terrorist, several neurotics and a man with a split personality known as ‘The Twin’. They seemed to have entirely misunderstood what the kind of kingdom that Jesus had mind was all about – which led them to their favourite discussion: which one of us is best. Jesus makes it clear that discipleship is nothing to do with self-preferment. What it is about is self-sacrifice. It is all about service.

The greatest among you should be like the youngest, and the one who rules like the one who serves. 27 For who is greater, the one who is at the table or the one who serves? Is it not the one who is at the table? But I am among you as one who serves.

‘I declare before you that my whole life, whether it be long or short, shall be devoted to your service’.

We have a monarch who serves, and, does so not because it is a nice idea, but because her firm and devoted Christian faith leads her to do so. And as we celebrate her service to this nation, the Commonwealth, and the wider world, we would do well to reflect on how we might emulate what she has done, and goes on doing. The Queen has rightly been cautious about saying much about her personal life in public. But what she has never shied away from has been her readiness to talk about her faith. She has said

‘for me the teaching of Christ and my personal accountability before God provide a framework in which I try to live my life’.

More than that, she has used her Christmas broadcasts to likewise share her deep understanding and the call for forgiveness and reconciliation that is at the heart of what we believe:

Although we are capable of great acts of kindness, history teaches us that we sometimes need saving from ourselves – from our recklessness or our greed. God sent into the world a unique person – neither a philosopher nor a general, important though they are, but a Saviour, with the power to forgive.

Forgiveness lies at the heart of the Christian faith. It can heal broken families, it can restore friendships and it can reconcile divided communities. It is in forgiveness that we feel the power of God's love.

That’s great preaching. Not because it’s well put – though it is – but because we know, from 60 years of service, that she believes it, that she means it, and that she lives it. There have been very tough times for the Queen as a human being, the now infamous ‘annus horribilis’ of 1992, and the events five years later surrounding the death of Diana, Princess of Wales, placing her under a public pressure such as few of us could even begin to imagine. Her selfless devotion to her family, to her people, and , I believe, her God, enabled her to offer to us all a model of how real humility can bring about profound change, and real dignity can reveal true majesty.

I believe that Her Majesty, were she to have the misfortune to have to sit listening to me preach, would be mortified to be forced to listen to such an encomium. I suspect, from what I have read, and what I have seen, that she would seek us, not to imitate her, but, rather, to imitate the One whom she has sought, all her life, to worship, honour, and praise. This One teaches us to serve. He teaches us to love. He teaches us to forgive. He teaches us to put ourselves and our own needs last, and other people and their needs first. He teaches us that his Kingdom – a Kingdom not of this world – is our project and our goal.

Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, Queen. As we celebrate these 60 years, this lifetime of service, let us likewise pray that we, by the grace of God, may fulfil our own callings, and devote our lives to the service of others, and to the service of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.

To Him be the Glory.

GOD SAVE THE QUEEN.




Easter Day 2012
A Sermon for the Benefice of Blenheim
Adrian Daffern

Alleluia! Christ is risen!

I hope you were given a little Easter present from me as you came into church this morning. The picture is "The Resurrection, Cookham" and was painted in the mid-1920's by Stanley Spencer.

Have a look at it. It portrays the resurrection in an extraordinarily imaginative way. The scene is set, not in a garden tomb in Jerusalem, but in the graveyard of Cookham Parish Church. The risen Christ is portrayed in a maternal way, cuddling two babies. The souls of the wicked, depicted in one or two graves, are getting tickings-off rather than being cast into hell-fire. The souls of the righteous are not soaring around singing alleluias to the accompaniment of snazzily dressed renaissance angels, but simply look contented and relaxed, extremely happy as they clamber out of their tombs.

Boundaries are deliberately confused in the picture. The Risen Christ is sitting comfortably with his little friends in the church porch. Some people are naked, some are dressed. A sense of overwhelming delight is conveyed with great charm: we see a woman, reconciled with her husband, carefully dusting down his jacket, another woman beaming as she smells a spring flower. The artist himself is seen reclining in his open tomb in the foreground of the painting, enjoying a moment of tranquillity and joy. Heaven and earth, rather than being distinct entities, are completely mixed up together.

Spencer was a Christian. He believed in the Resurrection, both in terms of our rising with Christ to eternal life, but also in terms of the continuing resurrection experiences of peace and love which come to Christians through prayer, worship and reflection. The painting depicts a resurrection which, on the face of it, is far from biblical, and yet, with imagination and thought, is full of gospel truth.

So what is the gospel truth of the Resurrection? St Mark, whose version of the first Easter we have just heard, leaves us decidedly in the dark. There is no actual appearance of the Risen Lord. No encounter with Mary Magdalene, no Emmaus Road, no Doubting Thomas experience, no breakfasts by the side of the lake, no Ascension. Just FEAR.
The last verse of Mark reads thus:

So the women went out and fled from the tomb, for terror and amazement had seized them; and they said nothing to anyone, for they were afraid.

The early church had a problem with this extraordinarily down-beat close to the gospel, and added some verses on to give the story a bit of what we call spin. But the original ending is there, just as we heard it read earlier. They had good reason to run - they were scared to death. They were afraid.

I find this enormously comforting. Think again about the story. Mary Magadalene, Mary the mother of James and Salome come to anoint Jesus' body. They were doing the right thing according to their custom, a beautiful, devout thing, an act of love. They've been through a ghastly experience, seeing their hopes crushed as Jesus' body, physically crushed, gasped for breath, hanging on a cross, that stormy, terrifying afternoon. Now it's early Sunday morning, and the sun is shining. They arrive at the tomb having been anxious now they would move the stone, and find it rolled back. Imagine their first reaction - what would it have been? Anger that someone had got there first? Fear that his body had been desecrated? Weariness at the prospect of yet more anxiety?

And then they go inside. A young man in white is sitting there, and says words which, I imagine, would have had about as little effect on those women as they would have on you or me: "Do not be afraid". This phrase is found more than any other throughout the whole of scripture, but I doubt that that was what went through the minds of those women. The young man continues

You are looking for Jesus of Nazareth, who was crucified. He has been raised; he is not here. Look, there is the place they laid him.

They came for the specific reason of seeing the body, of anointing the body, of touching the body, caressing the body, caring for the body. But the body is gone, and they, far from being in alleluia-mode, are gutted. Never mind don't be afraid. Of course they're afraid. They've come to honour the body, and the body is not there. And it gets worse. A vital task is assigned to them:

But go! Tell his disciples and Peter that he is going ahead of you to Galilee; there you will see him, just as he told you.

And then we get verse 8, telling us that they've run for their lives. And who can blame them? Certainly not us, who, far from being obedient to the command to tell others of the resurrection, also run away from the truth. We have the best story ever told, we believe it to be true, we hope it's going to be real for us one day too. And what do we do with this precious, priceless information? We run away from it. Worse still, some of us try to roll the stone back into place, and walk away if nothing as happened.

But truth doesn't allow us to get away with that. Remember Jonah? You can't seriously imagine you can run away from God, unto whom all hearts are open and all desires known? But we try. And that's why we are like those women, terrified, even in the face of the greatest news that has ever been told.

So what are we to do about it? Well, listen to the angel again. Do not be afraid. Those are his first words. And Jesus used them all the time. Do not be afraid. If we believe - and I mean really believe - the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, our lives are changed. The resurrection takes away not just our fear of physical death, but fear of all the little deaths that we deal with daily, the death of hope, ambition, and ego; the little deaths which happen when relationships are struggling, life is hard, money is scarce, love seems hard to find. The resurrection is not a "Jesus-comes-back-to-life" story, it is a "Jesus-is-alive" story, not some divine kiss-of-life, but a complete, total, utter transformation into something new, glorious and real. Grasping hold of the truth of this changes everything. And if you grasp hold of the truth of it, it will change you.

We've still got the problem of Mark's ending. It's such a cliff-hanger, such an anti-climax, those women running away, consumed with so much fear, so much emotional baggage, so much bewilderment and confusion. What are we do to with all of that?

Well, perhaps we should do what Stanley Spencer did with his painting. We work out the meaning of resurrection for our own lives, our own contexts, and we create it, colourfully, imaginatively. We could even begin to realise that it can be fun. Just because Mark's gospel leaves us standing in ruins shouldn't prevent us from imagining that that's the whole story. If you go to a ruined abbey or castle, you know that the whole story is much bigger. You use your imagination to re-create the sounds, structures and reality of what those ruins mean.

Mark's gospel lacks the soaring transepts, turrets and archways of Matthew, Luke and John. But it still tells the truth. And didn't someone once say that he had come in order that the truth might set us free?

Easter is truth. But it is also challenge. We who are happy to sing Alleluia in church need to learn to sing it outside church as well. If Easter is true, we can't run away from it. But we mustn't only preach it. No - we must live it. St Francis of Assisi gave this instruction to his followers: Preach the gospel by all means possible. If necessary, you could even use words.

There was once a famous ballerina. After one of her greatest performances, someone told her "you were wonderful! But can I ask - what did the dance actually mean? Her reply was simple, and devastating: "If I could have said it" she said "I wouldn't have needed to dance it, would I?".

Don't be afraid. Don't run away. Go and tell the others that Easter is real. But don't just tell them he's alive. Show them. For:

Alleluia! Christ is risen!




10th anniversary of 9/11 2011

Canon Adrian Daffern

Auden’s poem, 1st September 1939, is being quoted all over the place on this solemn weekend - with its peculiar, semi-prophetic sense of what was to come on the 11th September 2001. The poem speaks eloquently of the transitory nature of human enterprise, and the all-too-obvious truth of our fallenness, of our weakness, of our sin. As we shall sing in our offertory hymn: pride of man and earthly glory, sword and crown betray his trust; all that human toil can fashion – and these words will send a chill down our spines today, I’m sure – tower and temple fall to dust.

It is a fine coincidence – if we believe in coincidence – that the readings on this day when we cannot but think of the events of 9/11 are about judgement and forgiveness. But in fact any Sunday is a good day for us to be thinking about judgement and forgiveness.

For as Jesus pointed out, it’s no good peering at the speck in the eyes of others when we ignore the whopping great log in our own. What I mean is that we are prejudiced people. We judge. You've been judging since I started speaking, just as I am judging now, judging whose listening to me and who isn't, who I'm annoying and who I'm pleasing.

Don't worry - we can't help it. We all make judgements all of the time. And the judgements we like to make best are those we make, not about ourselves, but about other people. We find it all too easily to pass judgement on others, while we're not too keen on being judged ourselves. The reason why is obvious - when we are judged, we are immediately threatened. When others judge us, they are bound to land on our very weakest points, deficiencies in our personalities, skeletons which we thought we had locked away in the cupboard for good can so easily be brought out, with devastating consequences.

And if all we ever do is judge, then we are trapped. St Paul, in the letter to the Romans, is clear that we should be ultra-cautious about judging others. It is God who is judge, not us. Elsewhere the Apostle writes (using the words of the Authorised Version) "Judge Not; lest ye yourselves be judged". That is a pretty clear message.

Over the last ten years we have been exposed often to a media and political elite who have sought to make judgements about what happened on 9/11, and why. Who knew what, when.

This is sometimes referred to as a blame culture, and that’s a phrase that I understand well. I have worked in contexts where a blame culture has existed – when things have gone wrong, or haven’t happened, people have been quick to point the finger, wanted quickly to know whose fault something is, know – and I guess this is the main motivation – that they are in the clear.

Probably because it makes us feel better; we're not so bad after all. But didn't Jesus have something to say about the speck in the eye of others, and the plank in our own? If we start passing judgement on those around us, or those we consider to be beneath us, we may find ourselves in a heap of difficulties.

Sitting on the bench, we place ourselves above others, when our rightful place is more likely to be in the dock. We are no longer free people. Our attitudes trap us, and there is no room left for manoeuvre. Rather than listen and reflect, we lash out, and conflict ensues.

Jesus was in the business of freeing people. Freeing people from illness and pain, but perhaps more importantly, freeing people whose attitudes had imprisoned them. Jesus came to set people free from the prisons that life had created around them. We do well to remember that Jesus' very name means Saviour, and the work of saving, releasing, redeeming, healing, is what he is all about.

Healing is freedom, and Jesus came to bring both.

Now, you might want to say that there's nothing you need freeing from, thank you very much. But is that really true? How ready are you to listen to other people's views before you chime in with your own? How careful are you about leading a caring and generous life, before you criticise and judge others? How many of your attitudes and opinions are, in fact, imprisoning you, and need transforming and releasing?

All of us are in the position of needing the freedom that comes from knowing and loving God in Jesus Christ - all of us. And the time to start sorting ourselves out is now.


And perhaps we can have a go at that. If we are to love our neighbour as our self, then loving our self – not judging our self, forgiving our self – is the place to start. But what of others? How can we pray for forgiveness for those who hijacked planes and flew them into the World Trade Centre, and the Pentagon? How can we forgive those who hate our very way of being, and long to destroy it, and us?

Jesus answered: I tell you, not seven times, but seventy-seven times. It is so hard for us to get our heads round this. So counter to our natural instincts. But there it is, and not only here in the Gospel, but throughout the Gospel, even at the heart of the prayer that Jesus taught us to pray: Forgive us our trespasses, as forgive those who trespass against us. It’s not either or. It’s both and. It’s not an optional extra. It is the will of God. For in the heart of God there is unlimited forgiveness, amazing grace, and it is indeed a sweet sweet sound.

The Anglican liturgy is big on repentance. Indeed, when I give the absolution after a prayer of confession, I often use an official form of words which says that God forgives all those who truly repent – as if repentance is a necessary pre-condition of the forgiving grace of God. But that’s not what scripture teaches. The forgiveness which Jesus preaches recognizes that repentance, however desirable, is not required where love abounds. And this is tough. I can honestly put my hand on my heart and say that there have been things that people have said about me, and things that people have done to me, which have been so horrid that I am not sure that I have really forgiven them the hurt that they have caused. But I know I have to try. And I know I have to keep on trying, if I myself am ever to be truly forgiven.

Not seven times, but seventy-seven times. Unlimited forgiveness, which God bestows on us, and invites us to bestow on each other. We are sinners. But we are forgiven. So there is hope, beyond the judgement, and grace unending beyond all our pain.

I hope you will forgive me reference to Coventry Cathedral – but I cannot preach about these things, or reflect adequately on the commemorations of this day, without recalling the message of peace and reconciliation which Coventry has come to represent to the world.

400 bombers attacked Coventry for nearly 12 hours. 600 were killed. Over 1000 injured. 46 000 homes wrecked. The city centre turned to rubble.

Provost Richard Howard, who risked his life in his attempt to save the old cathedral, reflected later that:

What we want to tell the world is this: that we are trying, hard as it may be, to banish all thoughts of revenge from our hearts and minds. We are going to try to make a kinder, simpler, a more Christ-Child-like sort of world in the days beyond this strife.
And we, even we in this little church, in this little town, have this calling: through our attempts to hold fast to the Gospel, to say our prayers, to read our Bibles, to worship week in week out, we can build that kinder, more Christ-like sort of world, which is what the heart of God longs for, what the Son of God died for.

But it cannot happen by itself. Only the way of the cross is given to us to walk. And those of us who dare to walk it must shun the temptation to judge, and to learn to forgive.





© 2012 Design by
OPUS Editorial | Contact the Benefice of Blenheim